Ancient Library
The Greek and Latin classics — every word parsed, every form defined

Anselm of Canterbury, Saint: De Grammatico

Library › Latin: Philosophy › De Grammatico

The De Grammatico is a dialogue on logic by Anselm, written at the abbey of Bec. A student asks whether ‘grammaticus’ (literate, or grammarian) is a substance or a quality, so that he may understand other words used denominatively in the same way; he claims that both answers can be proved by necessary reasons, since every grammarian is a man and every man a substance, while the philosophers call it a quality. The teacher examines these syllogisms in twenty-one short chapters, exposing their faults and distinguishing between what a word signifies and what it names, so that ‘grammaticus’ signifies literacy directly and the man only indirectly.

In the preface to De Veritate Anselm himself sets this dialogue apart from his three works on Scripture as an introduction to dialectic. It is his only purely logical work and an important witness to the study of Aristotle’s Categories and Boethius in the eleventh century, especially to questions of paronymy, signification and reference. Modern historians of logic have given it close attention for its precise handling of these semantic distinctions.

About this edition. The Latin text comes from Corpus Corporum, the Latin text repository of the University of Zurich (edition: Jacques-Paul Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 158, Parisiis 1853), reused with attribution for non-commercial purposes (CC BY-NC-SA). Every word has been analyzed with LatinCy, a neural language model for Latin — click or tap any word for its dictionary form, part of speech, and complete morphology, together with the full entry from Lewis & Short’s A Latin Dictionary.

Latin · Philosophy
De Grammatico
Anselm of Canterbury, Saint · Caput Primum. 143 An grammaticus sit substantia, an qualitas: proponuntur… · every word parsed
1
DISCIPULUS. De grammatico peto, ut me certum facias utrum sit substantia an qualitas; ut hoc cognito, quid de aliis quae similiter denominatiue dicuntur sentire debeam agnoscam. MAGISTER. Dic primum cur dubites? DISC. Ideo, quia uidetur utrumque posse probari necessariis rationibus, esse scilicet, et non esse. MAG. Proba ergo. DISC. Ne ergo festines contradicere quidquid dixero, sed patere me rationem ad suum finem perducere: deinde aut approba, aut corrige. MAG. Ut uis. DISC. Ut quidem grammaticus probetur esse substantia, sufficit quia omnis grammaticus homo, et omnis homo substantia. Quidquid enim habet grammaticus, ut sequatur eum substantia, non habet nisi ex eo quia homo est. Quare hoc concesso ut homo sit, quaecunque sequuntur hominem, sequuntur grammaticum. Quod uero grammaticus sit qualitas, aperte fatentur philosophi qui de hac re tractauerunt, quorum auctoritatem de his rebus est impudentia improbare. Item quoniam necesse est ut grammaticus sit aut substantia aut qualitas, ut quodlibet horum sit, alterum non sit; et quodlibet non sit, alterum necesse sit esse: quidquid ualet ad instruendam unam partem, destruit alteram: et quidquid unam debilitat, alteram roborat. Cum ergo alterum horum uerum sit, alterum falsum; rogo ut falsitatem detegens, aperias mihi ueritatem.
Click or tap any word for its parse and dictionary entry.
Text: Perseus Digital Library, licensed CC BY-SA. Dictionary: Lewis & Short (Perseus, CC BY-SA). Morphology: LatinCy — machine parsing, corrected against the AGDT & PROIEL treebanks and Morpheus.
Scroll to Top